Nickel based alloys to prevent metal dusting degradation

ABSTRACT

An article of manufacture for reducing susceptibility of a metal pipe to metal dusting degradation. The article includes a multi-layer tubing having an alloy layer and a copper layer. The alloy layer can include a Ni based, an Al based and an Fe based alloy layer. In addition, layers of chrome oxide, spinel and aluminum oxide can be used.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S.Application 60/686,480, filed Jun. 1, 2005, incorporated herein byreference in its entirety.

GOVERNMENT INTEREST

The United States Government has certain rights in the inventionpursuant to Contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38 between the U.S. Department ofEnergy and the University of Chicago operating Argonne NationalLaboratory.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method of manufacture and alloy compositionfor preventing metal dusting degradation. More particularly theinvention relates to nickel-based alloys with aluminum addition and alsoto the use of a copper-based layer to prevent metal dusting-corrosion.

Metal dusting is a catastrophic corrosion phenomenon that leads to thedeterioration of structural metals and alloys into a dust composed offine particles of the metal/alloy and carbon. This is usually alocalized form of attack and occurs at intermediate temperatures ofabout 350°-800° C. However, this type of corrosion is possible at anytemperature when the carbon activity (a_(c)) in the gas phase is >>1.Metal dusting corrosion occurs in many metallic alloys, particularlyFe-, Co- and Ni-base alloys, when exposed to carbonaceous atmospheres.Under these conditions, the alloys undergoing metal dusting develop pitsand holes on the surface, and then disintegrate into a powdery mixtureof carbon, oxides, carbides, and fine metal particles. Metal dusting isa more severe problem than carburization since process equipment orcomponent piping will be functionally inoperative from damage occurringwhen alloys become fine powder.

Petroleum refineries are one example of industrial environments whichneed to operate in high carbon activity environments; and as a result,the equipment experiences metal wastage in processes involvinghydro-dealkylation and catalyst re-generation systems. Metal wastagealso occurs in direct iron-ore reduction plants wherein reformed methaneis dried and reheated to enhance ore-reduction efficiency. The ammoniasynthesis process also shows metal wastage in the heat-recovery sectionof the reformed-gas system as well as in the reformer itself. Gases usedin heat-treating mixtures contain oil residue on items to form gasesthat are chemically favorable for metal dusting. Gas mixtures used forcarburizing can also cause metal wastage if control of chemistry is notmanaged. Therefore, the heat-treat industry also suffers metal wastageproblem. Other example processes wherein metal wastage occurs arenuclear plants that employ carbon dioxide for cooling the recycle gasloop equipment of coal-gasification units, iron-making blast furnaces insteel mills, and fuel cells that use hydrocarbons.

Metal dusting usually occurs at temperatures as low as 350° to about800° C. In a hydrogen plant, hot carbon bearing gases are producedprimarily by steam reforming and partial oxidation of hydrocarbon attemperatures of 800-1000° C. These gases have to be quenched to 300° C.to avoid metal dusting in the temperature window 400-800° C. Energy inhigh temperature syngas is not recovered in an efficient manner. Plantproduction is generally affected by unforeseen shut-downs due to metalwastage problem. Therefore, it is necessary to develop new methods toprevent this metal dusting problem in the temperature window from about350° to 800° C.

There are conventional techniques to try to reduce metal dusting bycoating construction materials with thin layers of copper which aredescribed in US005676821A. The coatings, in general, containmicroporosity which can enable the reactive gases to permeate anddegrade the integrity of the thin coating layers. It has been shown thatcarburizing gas can slowly diffuse through the coating layer andeventually lead to failure of the protective coating. This simplecoating approach, even though beneficial in short term, is generally notamenable to prevent metal dusting over long term in the service ofmetallic structures in process plants.

Oxide scales also can play a role in preventing alloys from metaldusting corrosion since carbon diffuses much more slowly through theoxide layers, especially if defects such as pores and cracks are notpresent in the oxide layers. Because oxide scales are potentially usefulin preventing metal dusting corrosion, it is important to considerfurther the role of their composition and microstructuralcharacteristics in the initiation and propagation of metal dusting.However, the composition and phases present in oxide scales have beenrarely investigated and thus not well understood since the oxide layer,generally, is too thin to detect and analyze by conventional X-raymethods.

Copper-aluminum, copper-silicon alloys are also proposed as constructionmaterials to resist metal dusting corrosion (see, for example,WO03072836). However, the mechanical strength of these materials are toolow at high temperature for their use as monolithic structural materialsfor long term service. Many industrial processes involve high pressuresand elevated temperatures. Therefore, new approaches are needed toresist metal dusting corrosion of metallic structures for service athigh temperatures and high pressures over long term periods of interestin the industrial sector.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

While not meant to limit the scope of the invention, it is believed thatmetal dusting is due to the crystallization of carbon inside thesubstrate alloys. Carbon diffuses into alloys after it deposits on asurface by catalytic reaction of the gas phase constituents. Carbon thenfinds a special facet of microcrystal in a metal and precipitates insidethe metal, and this process leads to the separation of metal particles.The bulk alloy then finally separates into fine particles and/or metaldust. Whenever carbon diffuses into the alloy, metal dusting isdifficult to stop, and an effective way to prevent metal dusting is tobuild a dense barrier on a surface of metal and minimize carbondiffusion. If carbon cannot diffuse through the barrier, metal dustingcorrosion, generally, does not happen. Usually, alloys develop an oxidescale on its surface to prevent metal dusting, and the diffusion rate ofcarbon in oxide is very low. However, carbon atoms still can diffusethrough the defects in oxide scale and reduce the Fe-containing spinelphase to form channels for carbon diffusion. Whenever the channels form,there is no way to stop the diffusion of carbon into alloys. Thisprocess leads to initiation and propagation of pitting corrosion.

Copper specimens have been tested in several forms by exposing them in ametal dusting environment at various temperatures. Copper was found tobe noncatalytic for carbon deposition. Almost no deposit of carbon wasobserved in these experiments. The copper was also combined with anothermetal/metal alloy layer to form a bimetallic barrier layer combination.

The solubility and diffusion rate of carbon in copper are low.Therefore, copper is an excellent material to prevent metal dusting.However, the mechanical strength of copper at high temperature is toolow. It is thus difficult to directly use pure copper as a structuralmaterial at elevated temperatures. Most of the materials used in metaldusting environment are in the form of vessels, tubing, and piping.Therefore, bimetallic tubing was prepared with an inner copper tubingand an outer Fe or Ni-base alloy tubing to prevent metal dustingcorrosion. This dense copper layer on the inside diameter stops theformation/deposit of carbon and also stops the diffusion of carbon,thereby preventing the outer alloy tube from metal dusting corrosion.

The present invention also relates to several Ni-base alloys asmaterials for use to provide superior resistance to metal dustingdegradation when exposed to highly carbonaceous gaseous environmentsthat are prevalent in hydrogen-, methanol-, and ammonia-reformers and insyngas plants. In addition, the alloys developed have adequate strengthproperties for use as monolithic structural materials in the chemical,petrochemical, and syngas plants at temperatures up to 900° C. Thealloys developed have composition ranges (in wt. %) as follows: C0.02-0.2, Cr 22-29, Al 2.3-3.3, Fe 0-1, Ti 0.3, Zr 0.1-0.2, Y 0-0.1,Balance Ni (all ranges are approximate). The Ti, Zr and C additions aremade to control the carbide precipitation and thereby improve themechanical strength properties at elevated temperatures. Zr and Yadditions also contribute to improve the adhesion of the oxide scale tothe substrate alloy. The Cr and Al additions in the alloy greatly assistin resisting metal dusting.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic drawing of a cross section of a bimetal(Cu/Fe or Ni based alloy) tubing;

FIG. 2A illustrates alloy 800 after exposure in a carburizing gas for3700 h and FIG. 2B illustrates alloy 321 after exposure in a carburizinggas for 3700 h;

FIG. 3 illustrates a 3D-profile mapping of corrosion pits in alloy 800tested in a metal dusting environment at 593° C. for 150 h;

FIG. 4 illustrates an SEM image of Type 321 stainless steel tested in ametal dusting environment at 593° C. for 1100 h;

FIG. 5A illustrates an iron specimen with a 0.8 mm Cu-cladding tested ina metal dusting environment at 593° C. for 600 h, and FIG. 5Billustrates a base iron coupon tested under the same conditions as thespecimen of FIG. 5A;

FIG. 6 illustrates weight change data for copper and iron based alloysafter exposure in Gas No. 11 at 593° C. and 1 atmosphere pressure;

FIG. 7 illustrates copper and nickel based alloys exposed to Gas No. 14at 593° C. at 1 atmosphere pressure;

FIG. 8 illustrates Raman shift versus intensity for a simulated fit of abroad band for Alloy 153MA with Cr₂O₃ and spinel Raman bandssuperimposed on the broad band;

FIG. 9 illustrates weight change data for various (Fe, Cr) spinel phasesand (Ni, Cr) spinel phase during exposure in a metal dusting gas mixtureat 593° C.;

FIG. 10 illustrates X-ray diffraction data for FeCr₂O₄ and other oxidesfor Alloy 800 after exposure in a carburizing gas consisting of vol. %:66.2H₂-7.1 CO₂-23 CO-1.4 CH₄-2.3H₂O at 593° C. for 1000 h;

FIGS. 11A-11D illustrate Raman data for different Alloys 253MA, 153MA,T91 and T22 after exposure in a carbonizing gas consisting of vol. %:52H₂-5.6 CO₂-18 CO-1.1 CH₄-23H₂O at 593° C. for 1000 h;

FIG. 12 illustrates Raman spectra of Alloys 253MA and 601;

FIG. 13 illustrates Raman spectra of Alloys 310 and 602CA;

FIG. 14 illustrates Raman spectra of Alloy 601 exposed in a carburizinggas consisting of vol. %: 53.4H₂-18.4 CO-5.7 CO₂-22.5H₂O at 593° C. at200 psi for 100 and 2900 h;

FIG. 15 illustrates Raman spectra of Alloy 690 exposed in a carburizinggas consisting of vol. %: 53.4H₂-18.4 CO-5.7 CO₂-22.5H₂O at 593° C. at200 psi for 100 and 2900 h;

FIG. 16 illustrates Raman spectra of Alloy 45™ exposed in a carburizinggas consisting of vol. %: 53.4H₂-18.4 CO-5.7 CO₂-22.5H₂O at 593° C. at200 psi for 100 and 2900 h;

FIG. 17 illustrates thermal stability of spinel and Cr₂O₃ phases in Gas10 consisting of (in vol %) 53.5H₂-18.4 CO-5.7 CO₂-22.5H₂O.

FIG. 18A illustrates schematically a mechanism for diffusion of carbonand metal dusting of an alloy without presence of Al in the alloy andFIG. 18B with the presence of Al in the alloy;

FIG. 19 illustrates a schematic of a high pressure, high temperaturetest facility;

FIG. 20A illustrates an SEM micrograph of Alloy 601 after exposure to ametal dusting environment at 14.3 atmosphere and 593° C. for 160 h; FIG.20B is Alloy 601 at 1 atmosphere and 593° C. for 240 h; FIG. 20C is forAlloy 690 at 14.3 atmosphere and 593° C. for 160 h; FIG. 20D is forAlloy 690 at 1 atmosphere at 593° C. for 240 h; FIG. 20E is for Alloy617 for 14.3 atmosphere and 593° C. for 160 h; FIG. 20F is alloy 617 at1 atmosphere and 593° C. is for 240 h; FIG. 20G is for Alloy 214 at 14.3atmosphere and 593° C. for 160 h; and FIG. 20H is for Alloy 214 at 1atmosphere and 593° C. for 240 h;

FIG. 21 illustrates weight loss data for several Ni-based alloys (seeinset lists of alloys) after exposure in a metal dusting environment at593° C. and 14.3 atmosphere;

FIG. 22A illustrates an SEM micrograph of Alloy 45™ showing pit sizevariation after 1540 h; with FIG. 22B after 2180 h; FIG. 22C after 2500h; and FIG. 22D after 3300 h; FIG. 22E is for alloy 690 after 2900 h;with FIG. 22F after 4100 h; FIG. 22G after 7300 h and FIG. 22H after9300 h; FIG. 22I is for alloy 617 after 2900 h; with FIG. J after 4100h; FIG. 22K after 7300 h and FIG. 22L after 9300 h;

FIGS. 23A-23G illustrate correlation of weight loss and variation incorrosion pit size for a single pit on the surface of the indicatedalloy series as a function of exposure time at 593° C. in a metaldusting environment;

FIGS. 24A-24H illustrate 3D-profile mapping of the surface of theindicated Ni-based series of alloys after 9700 h exposure in a metaldusting environment at 593° C. and 14.3 atmospheres;

FIGS. 25A-25H illustrate Raman spectra for the indicated Ni-based seriesof alloys after 2900 h exposure in a metal dusting environment at 593°C. and 14.3 atmosphere;

FIG. 26 illustrates thermal stability of various indicated spinel andCr₂O₃ phases; and

FIG. 27A illustrates Raman spectra of Alloy N06601 after exposure for100 h and 2900 h for 593° C. in a metal dusting environment at 593° C.,FIG. 27B for N07790, FIG. 27C for 617, FIG. 27D for 45™, FIG. 27E for625; FIG. 27F for 214; FIG. 27G for HR160 and FIG. 27H for 693.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Multi-Layer Metal Tubing

In a first embodiment of the invention a multi-layer metal tubing isillustrated schematically in FIG. 1 at 10. The most preferred form ofthe invention constitutes a bi-metal Cu/Fe or Ni based alloy. Thethickness of copper and copper alloy tubing is >0.1 mm. It can bepreferably bonded or fabricated without bonding between copper innertubing 12 and outer alloy tubing 14. Bonding is better becausecarburizing gas cannot diffuse through between the two tubes in casethere is a defect in the copper tubing 12. To bond the copper tubing 12together, a thin layer of low melting temperature metals or theirmixtures such as zinc, silver, tin, and cadmium, were coated either onouter surface of the copper tubing 12, or on the inner surface of thealloy tubing 14, or both surfaces. High temperature and pressure wereapplied to bond the tubes together.

Experiments were conducted in a horizontal furnace with a quartz tube (2in dia.) at 1 atm and in a tube furnace at high pressures. The testtemperature was 593° C. (1100° F.). The experiments are conducted inseveral gas mixtures and at several system pressures. Some samples weretested for >10000 h. The composition of test gases used for theevaluation is shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 Chemical compositions of gasmixture relevant for metal dusting study. H₂ C_(O) C0₂ H₂0 CH₄ Gas (mol%) (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) (mol %) Other (mol %) 1 43.8 7.2 5.7 39.2 4.1— 2 52 18 5.6 23 1.1 —  2b 66.2 23 7.1 2.3 1.4 — 3 36.3 8.4 5.6 35 0.2N₂ 15, Ar 0.1 4 74.2 17.5 8.3 0 — — 5 72.2 17.6 8.3 2.0 — — 6 77.2 12.710.1 0 — — 7 25.3 70 4 0.01 — — 8 71.4 11.3 17.4 0 — — 9 71 11.7 17.3 0— — 10 53.4 18.4 5.7 22.5 — — 11 79.5 18.2 — 2.3 — — 12 75.4 6.2 18.4 —— — 13 71.0 2.6 26.4 — — — 14 40 45 5 10 — — 15 20 65 5 10 — — 16 40 2525 10 — — 17 20 74.5 5 0.5 — —

Table 2 shows that copper and copper alloy specimens were resistant todegradation by metal dusting. However, most of the state-of-the-art,commercial and experimental Fe- and Ni-base alloys were attacked in thesame environment. FIGS. 2 and 3 shows pits that were observed onsurfaces of Alloys 800 and 321 stainless steel after exposure in metaldusting environment. FIG. 4 shows that a deep pit that developed inAlloy 321. In Alloy 800, carbon was heavily deposited on the surface andmetal dusting pits were observed, whereas, carbon neither was visuallyobserved on the copper sample, nor was detected by X-ray diffraction.This indicates that copper did not catalyze the gas phase reaction todeposit carbon. Therefore, the carbon growth rate on copper wasextremely low.

FIG. 5A shows the surface of the copper-clad iron specimen afterexposure to metal dusting environment at 593° C. The surface was cleanand devoid of any deposit of carbon. The clad specimen did not loseweight after metal dusting test. However, the surface of the bare(un-clad) iron specimen of FIG. 5B was covered by carbon after metaldusting exposure for only 100 h iron was consumed at a rate of0.55-mg/cm²-h. The test results indicate that application of a densecopper clad >0.1 mm on the alloy surface prevented metal dusting attack.

FIG. 6 shows a series of metals and metal alloys (alloy key in the insetbox). FIG. 6 indicates copper was not attacked by metal dusting evenafter exposure for >7000 h. However, other Fe-base alloys lost weightsignificantly during the same exposure period. Copper alloys also showedstrong resistance to metal dusting. No weight losses were observed forthese alloys after 3000 h exposure to carburizing gas. Meanwhile,Ni-base Alloy 214 severely lost weight (see FIG. 7). TABLE 2 Metaldusting experimental results for Cu alloys Exp. Gas Time Pressure #Material # (h) (atm) Results 33 Cu coated iron 4 163 1 Clean surface andalloys 35 Cu clad Fe plate 4 784 1 Clean surface 36 Glidcop 4 144 1Clean surface 37 Cu coated iron 4 120 1 Clean surface and alloys 41 Cu 8100 27 Clean surface 42 Cu 8 100 14 Clears surface 43 Cu 13 100 41 Cleansurface 45 Glidcop 4 300 1 Clean surface 49 Cu 10 1131 14 Clean surface50 Cu 10 100 14 Clean surface 51 Cu 10 113 41 Clean surface 52 Cu 10 68041 Clean surface 53 Cu 11 8348 1 Clean surface 54 Cu 14 1950 1 Cleansurface 56 Cu—Ni-A1 2 14 10027 1 No weight loss 56 Cu—Ni-A1 4 14 10027 1No weight loss 56 Cu—Ni-AI 12 14 10027 1 No weight loss 56 Cu—Ni-A1 2014 10027 1 No weight loss 59 Cu—Ni-A1 2 10 8900 14 No weight loss 59Cu—Ni-A1 4 10 8900 14 No weight loss 60 Cu 10 246 1 Clean surfaceB.—Nickel-base Alloys with Low Iron Content

Extensive studies were conducted on metal dusting with a variety ofcommercial Fe- and Ni-base structural alloys in environments thatsimulate reformer environment. Alloys generally develop oxide scales inthe exposure environment, but depending on the phases present in theoxide scales in the reduction of these phases, lead to nucleation andgrowth of pits leading to catastrophic failure of the alloy into powder.The characteristics of different oxide scales were examined and alsocorrelated the information with the compositions of the alloys and theirresistance to metal dusting.

It was determined that diffusion of carbon through oxide scale isdifficult. However, Fe-, Co, and Ni-base alloys cannot avoid metaldusting corrosion if high activity carbon diffuses into the alloys.Therefore, the quality of the oxide scale is very important for alloysto resist metal dusting corrosion. Raman experiments show there arethree types of oxides in oxide scale, which are Cr₂O₃, disorderedchromium oxide, and Fe_(1+x)Cr_(2-x)O₄ (0≦x≦1) spinel (FIG. 8).

To study the reaction of these oxides with carburizing gas, Cr₂O₃, (Fe,Cr)₃O₄ spinel, and Cr metal were tested in a carburizing gas consistingof (in vol. %) 52H₂-5.6 CO₂-18CO-1.1CH₄-23H₂O at 593° C. in a thermogravimetric test apparatus. Disordered chromium oxide and Cr₂O₃ formedon the surface of Cr metal. Weight gains of FeCr₂O₄, Cr₂O₃, and Cr metalwere almost zero. Although the carbon activity of the carburizing gasconsisting of (in vol. %) 52H₂-5.6CO₂-18CO-1.1CH₄-23H₂O was >1 at 593°C., the deposition of carbon on Cr₂O₃, disordered chromium oxide, andFeCr₂O₄ is difficult since the activation barrier is high for thefollowing reactions:CO+H₂=C+H₂O  (1)2CO=C+CO₂  (2)

If the alloy surface is totally covered by Cr₂O₃, disordered chromiumoxide, and FeCr₂O₄, carbon deposition and metal dusting may not occur.However, weight gain was observed for Fe_(1.8)Cr_(1.2)O₄, and the carbondeposition rate in Fe_(2.4)Cr_(0.6)O₄ was much larger than that ofFe_(1.8)Cr_(1.2)O₄ (FIG. 9). Therefore, spinel with high iron contentseems to catalyze reaction 1 and/or 2, which leads to deposition ofcarbon.

Cr₂O₃ is stable in carbon and hydrogen atmospheres down to very low Po₂.This oxide is an excellent protective layer in preventing alloys frommetal dusting corrosion. Fe(Cr_(1-x)Fe_(x))₂O₄ spine, on the other hand,is not as stable as Cr₂O₃. The composition of the spinal can vary fromFeCr₂O₄ [x=0 in Fe(Cr_(1-x)Fe_(x))₂O₄] to Fe₃O₄ (x=1). As mentionedabove, Fe₃O₄ is not stable when the H₂O concentration is low. Thestability of FeCr₂O₄ is higher than that of Fe₃O₄, but lower than thatof Cr₂O₃. If there are no defects such as nonuniform distribution ofcations, FeCr₂O₄ should be stable in a carburizing gas. However, it hasbeen reported that FeCr₂O₄ starts to be partially reduced by carbon at600° C. FIG. 10 shows that the X-ray peak position of the spinal on thesurface of Alloy 800 is between Fe₃O₄ and FeCr₂O₄, and the peak is alsomuch broader than that of polycrystalline Fe₃O₄ and FeCr₂O₄. Thus, itappears the spinal on the surface of alloy is not stoichiometricFeCr₂O₄, but has higher iron content and such a spine is likelysusceptible to reduction by carbon.

The higher the concentration of iron in Fe(Cr_(1-x)Fe_(x))₂O₄, theeasier is the spinel reduction. The ratio of Fe/Cr in spinel may varywith oxygen partial pressure in gas. When Po₂ in gas, such as in Gas 1,is higher than 7×10⁻²⁶ atm, the most unstable spinel Fe₃O₄ could form,which could be attacked by carbon leading to metal dusting corrosion ofthe underlying alloy. It is difficult to measure the iron content in theoxide layer because it is too thin. However, the iron content in theoxide scale increases with increasing iron content in the alloy.Furthermore, the iron concentration may not be uniform in the oxidescale. Some spots with high iron content may react with carbon first andmetal dusting will start from those regions. FIG. 11B shows that alloy153MA has less spinel phase in the oxide scale than does T91; therefore,153MA has fewer defects susceptible to attack by metal dusting corrosionthan does alloy T91 of FIG. 11C. This is also consistent with theobservation of smaller mass loss for 153MA than that for T91.

FIGS. 12 and 13 show the differences in Raman spectra for two pairs ofalloys: Alloy 253MA and 601, and Alloy 310 and 602CA. These alloys wereexposed for 1000 h to Gas 10 at 593° C. and 200 psi. The Cr content inAlloy 253MA (20.9%) and 601 (21.9%) is similar. However, the Fe-basealloy 253MA has a much stronger spinel peak than that of the Ni-basealloy 601 (FIG. 12). Pits were observed on Alloy 253MA, but not on Alloy601 when exposed under the same experimental conditions. The Cr contentin Alloy 310 (25.5%) and 602CA (25.1%) is also similar. FIG. 13 showsthe strong spinel peak for the Fe-base Alloy 310, but almost no suchpeak for the Ni-base Alloy 602CA. Pits were again observed only on Alloy310, but not on Alloy 602CA. Less spinel in the oxide scale of Ni-basealloys only means that the development of spinal takes a much longertime and that the incubation time for metal dusting initiation is muchlonger. However, the presence of Fe, even in low concentration, inNi-base alloys will lead to metal dusting degradation during years ofservice planned for these structural components in reformerenvironments.

Phase composition of oxide scales that developed on surface of alloyschanges with exposure time. FIGS. 14 to 16 (601, 690, 45™) show theintensity differences of Raman bands for Cr₂O₃ and spinel phases inoxide scale on surfaces of several alloys. When the alloys were exposedfor only 100 h, Cr₂O₃ was the major phase in oxide scales that developedon surface of alloys. However, after 2900 h exposure, the intensity ofspinel band in Raman spectra increased significantly.

The increasing amount of spinel phase in oxide scales over longerexposure time can be attributed to the outward diffusion of Fe from thealloy substrate. At early stages, Cr-rich oxide forms on the surface ofalloys. However, as the outward transported Fe is incorporated into thescale, spinel phase becomes dominant as was observed in the Ramanspectra. The diffusion rate of Fe and its incorporation in the scale toform the spinel phase would have a pronounced effect on the incubationtime for the onset of metal dusting in the alloy. As the transported Feis incorporated into the spinel phase, the protective capacity of thespinel is reduced, since the inward migrating carbon can easily reducethe high-iron-containing spinel (as discussed earlier).

Raman spectra showed that the intensity of Cr₂O₃ band at ≈560 cm⁻¹ waslow for Alloy 45™ and the relative intensity of spinel is high. As wasdiscussed earlier, spinal phase in the scale is not as good as Cr₂O₃scale in preventing alloys from metal dusting corrosion, which probablyis the cause for the alloy to undergo metal dusting. The Cr content in45™ is relatively high but the Fe content is also high. The presence ofhigh Fe content may stabilize the Fe-containing spinal phase rather thanCr₂O₃, thereby subjecting the alloy to metal dust. NiCr₂O₄ spine is notthermodynamically stable in a reducing environment used in our study andtherefore, could not form at 593° C. (see FIG. 17). The results suggestthat an alloy with a high Cr content (with or without Al) and almost noFe content may stabilize Cr₂O₃ and/or a spinal phase with high Crcontent, thereby prolong the incubation period for the onset of metaldusting and subsequent propagation of the process leading to metalwastage. Even small addition of iron will affect the quality of oxidescale and decrease the ability of alloys to resist metal dusting.

FIGS. 18A and 18B are schematic representations of a non-limitingmechanism that explains the function of aluminum in the resistance ofalloys to metal dusting corrosion. Physical defects may be present inoxide scales that develop on the surface of alloys. When carbon depositson these surfaces during exposure to a metal dusting environment, carbondiffuses through these defects and reduces the spinel phase to Fe₃Cand/or Ni metal. These particles form channels for transferring carbonthrough the oxide scale. Oxygen may also diffuse through these channelsleading to the formation of additional Cr oxide and slowing thediffusion of carbon. However, the carbon diffusion rate is probablyhigher than that of oxygen and formation of additional Cr oxide beneaththe carbon channel may not be feasible. Therefore, carbon can continueto diffuse into alloys through the channels and finally form metaldusting pits. When Al is added to the alloy, alumina scale usually formsunder the Cr oxide scale. The alumina may affect resistance to metaldusting corrosion in two ways. First, the carbon transferred through thechannel may not be able to penetrate through the alumina layer becausealumina is much more stable than spinel. Second, the partial pressure ofoxygen needed to form Al₂O₃ (3.6×10⁻⁵⁷ atm) is much lower than thatneeded to form Cr₂O₃ (2.6×10⁻³⁷ atm) at 593° C. A thin layer of aluminascale can form (even with limited oxygen transport through the channel)beneath the carbon diffusion channel, and thereby reduce the growth ofmetal dusting pits.

Various non-limiting examples are provided hereinafter and are based onthe following experimental procedure:

EXAMPLES

The test program included eight Ni-base wrought alloys, predominantlythose which are commercially available. Table 3 lists the nominalchemical compositions of the alloys. The alloys had complex chemicalcompositions and contained Cr (in a range of 15.4-28 wt. %) and severalother elements, such as Mo [alloy 617 (UNS N06617)], Al [601 (UNSN06601), 617 (UNS N06617), 602CA (UNS N06025), 214 (UNS N07214), and 693(UNS N06693)], and Si [45™ (UNS N06045) and HR 160 (UNS N12160)]. Alloy690 (UNS N06690) containing 27.2 wt. % Cr, but without additions of Si,or Mo, or Al was also included in the study. Further, several alloyscontained Nb, W, and Co, which can also influence the oxidation behaviorof the alloys and their resistance to metal dusting attack. TABLE 3Nominal composition (in wt. %) of alloys selected for the study. AlloyUNS. C Cr Ni Mn Si Mo Al Fe Other N06601 0.03 21.9 61.8 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.414.5 Ti 0.3, Nb 0.1 N06690 0.01 27.2 61.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 10.2 Ti 0.3N06617 0.08 21.6 53.6 0.1 0.1 9.5 1.2 0.9 Co 12.5, Ti 0.3 N06025 0.1925.1 62.6 0.1 0.1 — 2.3 9.3 Ti 0.13, Zr 0.19, Y 0.1 N07214 0.04 15.9 Bal0.2 0.1 0.5 3.7 2.5 Zr 0.01, Y 0.006 N06045 0.08 27.4 46.4 0.4 2.7 — —26.7 RE 0.07 N12160 0.05 28.0 Bal 0.5 2.8 0.1 0.2 4.0 Co 30.0 N066930.02 28.8 Bal 0.2 — 0.1 3.3 5.8 Nb 0.7, Ti 0.4, Zr 0.03

The samples were flat coupons with approximate dimensions of 12×20×1 to2 mm. They were sheared slightly oversize, and their edges were milledto remove cut edges and reduce the coupons to final size. A standardsurface finish was used for all alloy specimens. The finish involved afinal wet grinding with 400-grit SiC paper. Stenciling or electricengraving at the corner of the coupons identified all of the specimens.Prior to testing, specimens were thoroughly degreased in clean acetone,rinsed in water, and dried. The specimen dimensions were measured to±0.02 mm, and the total exposed surface area, including edges, wascalculated. The specimens were weighed to an accuracy of 0.1 mg.

FIG. 19 shows a schematic of a system that was used to conductexperiments at system pressures up to 600 psi. The system consisted of ahorizontal, tubular, high temperature furnace capable of operation up to900° C. The reaction chamber, with gas inlet/outlet fittings, fabricatedfrom alumina and/or quartz was positioned within a pressure vessel madeof a high temperature heat-resistant alloy (16-mm ID, 50-mm OD, 500-mmlong). A chromel-alumel thermocouple was inserted into the pressurevessel to monitor the specimen temperature. Specimens were suspendedfrom a quartz specimen holder and were positioned in theconstant-temperature section of the tubular furnace. High-purity gasessuch as CO, CO₂, and H₂, were piped into the reaction chamber throughflow meters to obtain the desired composition. To include steam in theexposure environment, water was pumped from a water pump, converted tosteam, pressurized, and inserted along with the gas mixture. Theeffluent from the reactor chamber was condensed to remove the waterprior to exhaust. Specimens were exposed to a flowing gas consisting of53.4% H₂-5.7% CO₂-18.4% CO-22.5% H₂O at 593° C. and 14.3 atm. The gas isa simulation of a reformer outlet gas. The calculated carbon activity ofthe gas at 593° C. is 2.2, 31, and 89 at 1, 14.3 and 40.8 atm,respectively, based on the reaction CO+H₂═C+H₂O.

Several analytical approaches and techniques were used to evaluate thetested specimens. These included metal weight gain/loss in as-exposedand cleaned conditions, pitting size and density (pits per unit area ofsurface), pit depth (average depth over significant number of pits), andsubstrate penetration as determined by metallographic examination. Afterthe specimens were weighed in the as-exposed condition, deposits on thespecimens were mechanically removed with a soft brush, and the depositmaterial was analyzed for metal content, if warranted. The brushedspecimens were cleaned ultrasonically to remove residual deposits andthen washed in water and dried. Subsequently, the specimens wereweighed, and the weight gain/loss was noted. The cleaned specimens wereexamined for surface pits by optical microscopy. This alloweddetermination of the number of pits present in different regions of thespecimen and the pit density. In addition, the sizes of several pitswere measured and averaged to establish an average pit size.

At the end of a given run, several of the cleaned specimens (afterweighing and pit measurement) were cut and mounted on the cut faces formetallographic polishing and examination in as-polished and inelectrolytically etched (with a 10% acetic acid solution at 10 V for 30sec) conditions, by optical and/or scanning electron microscopy. Pitdepth and substrate penetration thickness were measured in severalexposed specimens. Raman spectra were excited with 60 mW of 476-nmradiation from a Kr-ion laser. The incident beam impinged on the sampleat an angle=45° from the normal. Scattered radiation was collected alongthe surface normal with an NA lens and was analyzed with a tripleJobin-Yvon grating spectrometer. All of the spectra were acquired in 300sec at room temperature.

Ni-base alloys possess better resistance against metal dusting attackthan the Fe-base alloys. Without limiting the invention, the differencein the lattice mismatch in catalytic crystallization of carbon may beone reason. The misfit between Ni lattice to graphite lattice (3.6%) ismuch higher than that between Fe₃C and graphite (0.28%). Lattice of Fe₃Calmost perfectly matches the lattice of graphite. This indicates thatcarbon atoms moving from lattice of Fe₃C to graphite is easier than thatfrom Ni to graphite. Therefore, the precipitation of carbon on surfaceof Ni has a higher energy barrier than that on surface of Fe₃C, whichleads to lower carbon precipitation rate, smaller crystallite size, andlower metal dusting rate. The observed crystallite size of coke onnickel was smaller than that on iron. This difference suggests that Fe₃Cis better than Ni in serving as a template for the catalyticcrystallization of carbon, and may explain why the metal dusting rate ofFe and Fe-base alloys is higher than that of Ni and Ni-base alloys. Theother factor that can affect metal dusting rate is the chemical andmechanical integrity of the oxide layer that develops on the surface ofalloys. In this set of examples, the effect of alloy chemistry and phasecomposition of oxides on surface of Ni-base alloys on metal dustingrates shown. The information on metal dusting rate of several Ni-basealloys was examined in order to establish the best candidate alloys toresist metal dusting corrosion.

Weight Loss and Pit Development

No metal dusting attack was observed for Ni-base alloys in relativelyshort exposure time of 246 h at 1 atm pressure (Table 4). However, pitswere observed on Alloys N06601, N06690, N06617, and N07214 when exposedin the same gas at 593° C. and 14.3 atm (see Table 2). Similar resultswere obtained when specimens were tested at 40.8 atm (Table 4). FIGS.20A to 20H show the surface of several indicated alloys after exposureat 593° C. and 1 and 14.3 atm. The carbon activity in the gas is 14times higher than at 1 atm, which can decrease the incubation time forthe initiation of metal dusting pits the alloy surface. TABLE 4 Surfacecharacteristics of alloys after 246-h exposure at 593° C. UNS number ofSurface characteristics after exposure at alloy 1 atm 14.3 atm 40.8 atmN06601 Clean surface Pits Pits N06690 Clean surface Pits Pits N06617Clean surface Pits Pits N06025 Clean surface Clean surface Clean surfaceN07214 Clean surface Pits Pits N06045 Clean surface Clean surface Cleansurface N12160 Clean surface Clean surface Clean surface

Metal dusting attack, as measured by weight loss, was observed on allthe Ni-base alloys when tested for 9700 h in the same gas environment at593° C. and 14.3 atm (see FIG. 21). However, the weight loss rates forAlloys N06693 and N06045 were very low. Both alloys contain Al, havehigh Cr content, and low amount of Fe. The weight loss rate for AlloyN06045 was the highest among the Ni-base alloys used in the study,although the Cr content in this alloy is fairly high. The iron contentin Alloy N06045 is also the highest among these alloys. The weight lossrate of Alloy N06601 was also high. The iron content in Alloy N06601 isthe second highest among these alloys. The results indicate thataddition of iron to the Ni-base alloys results in substantial decreasein incubation time for the onset of metal dusting. When Fe content inthe alloy >10 wt. %, the alloy is readily attacked as evidenced bynumerous pits on the exposed surfaces of the alloy specimens. The weightloss rate for cobalt-containing Alloy N06617 is the second highest amongthese alloys. Mo addition in this alloy did not improve its resistanceto metal dusting corrosion. The other cobalt-containing Alloy N12160also exhibited metal dusting degradation, although it contained 28% Cr.Therefore, Co addition in alloys is also not beneficial in resistingmetal dusting. The Cr content in Alloy N07214 is the lowest among thesealloys and its weight loss rate was also high although it containedaluminum. High Cr content in alloys seems essential but not entirelysufficient for preventing metal dusting corrosion in Ni-base alloys.

Even though weight loss data developed for various alloys are useful inevaluation and ranking of the alloys from their susceptibility to metaldusting attack, such data may indicate the protective capacity of thesurface oxide scale and probably represent only an average behavior forthe alloy in a given exposure environment and temperature. Since thecorrosion damage in the alloy occurs by nucleation of pits on thesurface and their growth inward, it is essential to develop anunderstanding of the morphology of pits (such as pit size, pitdistribution, pit depth, etc.) on the alloy surface and of the maximumgrowth rate of the pits to evaluate the ultimate damage of componentfailure under a given set of exposure (process) conditions.

During the course of the 9700 h exposure experiment, the specimens wereretrieved periodically and SEM photomicrographs taken of differentregions all the specimens to characterize and monitor their growth as afunction of exposure time. FIGS. 22A-22C show the SEM photomicrographsof pit development in alloys N06045, N06690, and N06617 after exposurefor different times in the metal dusting environment at 593° C. and 14.3atm.

The dimension of a single pit (for each alloy) was measured as afunction of exposure time and correlated the pit size data with measuredweight change for the corresponding alloys. Table 5 lists the maximumpit size and weight loss for various alloys. FIGS. 23A-23G show themeasured pit size and weight change for all the alloys used in thepresent study. The plots, for most of the alloys, indicate a goodcorrelation between the growths in the size of an arbitrarily selectedpit on the surface of the alloy with the measured weight change.Furthermore, absolute increase in pit size as a function of exposuretime is different for different alloys. For example, the pit sizeincreases from 200 to 450 μm as the exposure time increases from 4000 to9300 h for Alloy N06601. The corresponding increases for Alloy N06690are 70 to 200 μm for time increase of 2900 to 9300 h. Similarinformation for other alloys can be obtained from the curved shown inFIGS. 23A-24G. TABLE 5 Maximum pit size and weight loss for alloys after9,700-h exposure. Weight Ratio of pit UNS number loss Pit depth Pitdiameter depth to pit of alloy (mg/cm²) (μm) (μm) diameter N06601 19.5110 450 0.244 N06690 6.5 147 440 0.334 N06617 35.1 201 887 0.227 N060252.1 96 374 0.256 N07214 25.6 Uniformly corroded N06045¹ 59.1 141 6000.235 N12160 7.3 13 210 0.062 N06693 0.1 37 99 0.374¹The alloy was exposed only for 3,300 h whereas the others were exposedfor 9,700 h.

The behavior of alloy N07214 is somewhat different from that of others,since there is a poor correlation between the size increase of a singlepit in this alloy with its weight change. The reason for this poorcorrelation is because this alloy contains low (15.9 wt. %)concentration of Cr and a high (3.7 wt. %) concentration of Al anddevelops a large number of small pits. The nucleation and growth of alarge number of small pits with low growth rates reflects in the weightchange but on the growth rate of an individual pit. The alloy exhibiteda uniform coverage after 3000 h exposure and the size of an individualpit could not be measured. Alloy N06045 exhibited an extremely rapidgrowth rate for the pit (380 to 600 μm during 1400 to 3400 h) and itsexposure was terminated after 3800 h. The cause for the rapid increasein pit growth in this alloy can be attributed to higher (26.7 wt. %) Fecontent of the alloy. FIGS. 24A-24H show a comparison of SEMphotomicrographs of surfaces of several alloys after exposure at 9700 hat 593° C. to the metal dusting environment. It is evident from thisfigure that Alloy N07214 develops a rough surface, attributed tomultitude of small and probably shallow pits.

Phase Composition of Scales

Raman spectra were excited with 60 mW of 476-nm radiation from a Kr-ionlaser. The scattered light was analyzed with a triple Jobin-Yvon gratingspectrometer. All of our spectra were acquired in 300 sec at roomtemperature. Raman spectra were developed on alloys after exposure at100 and 2900 h. FIGS. 25A-25H shows a comparison of Raman spectraobtained on the indicated alloys after exposure at 2900 h to the metaldusting environment.

Raman spectra showed that the intensity of Cr₂O₃ band at about 560 cm⁻¹was low for both Alloys N07214 and N06045 and the relative intensity ofspinel is high in both the alloys. Spinel phase in the scale is not asgood as Cr₂O₃ scale in preventing alloys from metal dusting corrosion,which probably is the cause for these two alloys to undergo metaldusting. The low Cr₂O₃ content on surface of Alloy N07214 may be due tothe low Cr content in alloy. On the contrary, Cr content in N06045 isrelatively high but the Fe content is also high. The presence of high Fecontent may stabilize the Fe-containing spinel phase rather than Cr₂O₃,thereby subjecting the alloy to metal dust. The fit to the broad Ramanband for alloy N06045 is due to disordered chromium oxide with oxygenvacancies. NiCr₂O₄ spinel is not thermodynamically stable in a reducingenvironment used in our study and therefore, could not form at 593° C.(FIG. 26). The results suggest that an alloy with a high Cr content(with or without Al) and low Fe content may stabilize Cr₂O₃ and/or aspinel phase with high Cr content, thereby prolong the incubation periodfor, the onset of metal dusting and subsequent propagation of theprocess leading to metal wastage.

Phase composition of oxide scales that developed on surface of alloyschanged with exposure time. FIGS. 27A-27H show the intensity differencesof Raman bands for Cr₂O₃ and spinel phases in oxide scale on surfaces ofseveral alloys after 100 and 2900 h exposure. When the alloys wereexposed for only 100 h, Cr₂O₃ was the major phase in oxide scales thatdeveloped on surface of alloys. However, after 2900 h exposure, theintensity of spinel band in Raman spectra increased significantly. OnAlloy N07214, spinel became the major phase after exposure for 2900 h,whereas Cr₂O₃ was the major phase in the oxide scale when the alloy hadbeen exposed for 100 h.

The increasing amount of spinel phase in oxide scales over longerexposure time can be attributed to the outward diffusion of Fe from thealloy substrate. At early stages, Cr-rich oxide forms on the surface ofalloys. However, as the outward transported Fe gets incorporated intothe scale, spinel phase becomes dominant as was observed in the Ramanspectra. The diffusion rate of Fe and its incorporation in the scale toform the spinel phase would have a pronounced effect on the incubationtime for the onset of metal dusting in the alloy. As the transported Fegets incorporated into the spinel phase, the protective capacity of thespinel is reduced, since the inward migrating carbon can easily reducethe high-iron containing spinel.

The Raman analysis showed that the spinel band intensity was the lowestfor Alloy N06693 after 2900 h exposure in the environment used in thestudy at 593° C. and 14.3 atm, indicating that the incubation time forthe onset of metal dusting for this alloy will be significantly greaterthan most of the others studied in this program.

In accordance with the principals of the present invention, anon-limiting model explains the function of aluminum to resist metaldusting corrosion as shown in (FIGS. 18A and 18B) as discussedhereinbefore. There may be defects in oxide scale that develop onsurface of alloys. When carbon deposits on surface of alloys duringexposure to metal dusting environment, carbon diffuses through thesedefects and reduce the spinel phase to Fe₃C and/or Ni metal. Theseparticles form channels for transferring carbon through oxide scale.Oxygen may also diffuse through the channels resulting in formation ofadditional chromium oxide. However, the carbon diffusion rate isprobably higher than that of oxygen and formation of additional chromiumoxide beneath the carbon channel may not be feasible. Therefore, carboncan continue to diffuse into alloys through the channels and finallyform dusting pits. When aluminum is added to the alloy, alumina scaleusually forms underneath chromium oxide scale. There may be two effectsof alumina to resist metal dusting corrosion. First, the carbontransferred through the channel may not be able to penetrate throughalumina layer because alumina is much more stable than spinel. Second,the partial pressure of oxygen to form Al₂O₃ (3.6×10⁻⁵⁷ atm) is muchlower than that of Cr₂O₃ (2.6×10⁻³⁷ atm) at 593° C. A thin layer ofalumina scale can form (even with limited oxygen transport through thechannel) beneath the carbon diffusion channel, thereby reducing thegrowth of metal dusting pits.

It should be understood that various changes and modifications referredto in the embodiment described herein would be apparent to those skilledin the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departingfrom the spirit and scope of the present invention.

1. An article of metallic material manufacture for reducingsusceptibility to metal dusting degradation, comprising a nickel basealloy comprising (in weight percentage) Cr of about 22-29, Al of about2.0-3.5, Fe of about 0-1.0; Ti of about 0-0.3, Zr of about 0.1-0.2, Y ofabout 0-0.1 and the balance Ni.
 2. The article as defined in claim 1wherein the nickel alloy contains iron less than about one percent. 3.The article as defined in claim 1 further including a multi-layer tubingfor passage of material therein and said tubing including a copper layeradjacent said nickel base alloy.
 4. The article as defined in claim 3wherein the multi-layer tubing includes an in-situ-developed chromiumoxide layer.
 5. The article as defined in claim 3 further including analuminum oxide layer disposed adjacent the chromium oxide layer.
 6. Thearticle as defined in claim 3 wherein the multi-layer tubing furtherincludes at least one of an aluminum oxide layer, a Fe(Cr_(1-x)Fe_(x))₂O₄ layer with high chromium to iron ratio, and asubstrate consisting essentially of copper, a Ni-based alloy layer andan Fe-based alloy layer.
 7. An a multi-layer article of manufacturehaving a metallic layer with reduced susceptibility to metal dustingdegradation, comprising: a tubing having multiple layers, themulti-layer tubing having a hollow passageway allowing for passage ofmaterial therein; and said multi-layer tubing including a copper alloylayer having a composition including at least copper; and said nickelalloy layer comprising (in weight percentage) Cr of about 22-29, Al ofabout 2.0-3.5, Fe of about 0-1.0; Ti of about 0-0.3, Zr of about0.1-0.2, Y of about 0-0.1 and the balance Ni; wherein said copper layeris positioned in said multi-layer tubing such that it will be exposed toa metal dusting degradation environment
 8. The article as defined inclaim 7 wherein the copper alloy layer is the innermost layer of themulti-layer tubing.
 9. The article as defined in claim 7 wherein thecopper alloy layer is bonded to the nickel alloy layer.
 10. (canceled)11. The article as defined in claim 7 wherein the multiple layers areselected from the group consisting of bonded layers and unbonded layers.12. The article as defined in claim 7 wherein the multi-layer tube hasat least two bonded layers and at least one of the bonded layers iscomprised of a low melting point metal.
 13. The article as defined inclaim 12 wherein the low melting point metal comprises at least one ofzinc, silver, tin, and cadmium.
 14. The article as defined in claim 7wherein the thickness of the copper alloy layer is greater than about0.1 mm.
 15. The article as defined in claim 7 wherein the copper alloycomprises weight percentages of copper in the range of about 50-90,aluminum about 2-20, and nickel about 4-20.
 16. The article as definedin claim 15 further comprising an oxide layer including at least one ofin-situ-developed Cr2O3 and FeCr2O4.
 17. The article as defined in claim7 wherein the nickel alloy layer further includes aluminum.
 18. Anarticle of manufacture for reducing susceptibility to metal dustingdegradation, comprising: a multi-layer metallic component for use in acorrosive atmosphere the component containing carbon.
 19. The article asdefined in claim 18 wherein the multi-layer metallic component furtherincludes at least one of a Ni alloy and an Fe alloy layer.
 20. Thearticle as defined in claim 18 wherein the multi-layer metalliccomponent further includes a cobalt alloy layer and no nickel alloylayer or iron alloy layer.